{Clinical trials + Field trials}

"On the impartiality of British trials", Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, forthcoming.

  “A contractarian solution to the experimenter’s regress”, PSA 2012 Proceedings, forthcoming

"Blinding and the non-interference assumption in field experiments", Philosophy of the Social Sciences, forthcoming.

With  Julian Reiss, “Causality, Impartiality and Evidence-Based Policy”, in H-K Chao, S-T, Chen & R. Millstein, Mechanism and causality in biology and economics, Springer, forthcoming.

"Frequentist versus Bayesian Clinical Trials", in Fred Gifford, ed., Philosophy of Medicine [Handbook of Philosophy of Science, vol. 16], Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2010, pp. 255-297

J. Reiss, M. Solomon, D. Teira, eds., "Mechanisms, continental approaches, trials, and evolutionary medicine: New work in the philosophy of medicine", special issue of Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31,2 (2011)

 

{Positivism and prediction, Friedman's methodology}

"The Politics of Positivism: Disinterested Predictions from interested agents", in U. Mäki, ed., The Methodology of Positive Economics: reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 189-214 (with J. Zamora Bonilla).

"Why Friedman's methodology did not generate consensus among economists?", Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31.2 (2009), 201-214. 

Editor, Review Symposium: J. Reiss, Error in economics, Economics and philosophy, 25.2 (2009), 199-215 

"Milton Friedman, the Statistical Methodologist", History of Political Economy 39.3 (2007), 511-528 

"A Positivist Tradition in Early Demand Theory", Journal of Economic Methodology 13.1 (2006), pp. 25-47. 

"Frank Knight: Le risque comme critique de l'économie politique", Revue de Synthèse 121.4 (2000), pp. 79-116.  

{Facts and values in expected utility theory}

"Facts, Norms and Expected Utility Functions", History of the Human Sciences 21.2 (2008), 45-62 

"On the Normative Dimension of St. Petersburg Paradox", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2006), pp. 210-23. .......

"The Theology of Large Numbers: a Conjecture", Journ@l Electronique d'Histoire des Probabilités et de la Statistique 2/1 (2006) 

Jan Sprenger & David Teira, “The Ethics of Statistical Testing”, in C. Luetge, ed., Handbook of Business Ethics, Springer, 2013, pp. 1535-1549.

Social Epistemology | Phil.Soc.Sci

D. Teira &, J. Zamora, eds, "Science, normativity and the public", Social epistemology, 21.1 (2007), pp. 1-81 

J. Reiss, D. Teira, J. Zamora, eds., "New Philosophy of the social sciences", Philosophy of the social sciences, 38.3 (2008), 311-78

"Continental Philosophies of the Social Sciences", I. Jarvie & J. Zamora (eds.), The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Science, London, Sage, 2011.

 

«Los economistas como metodólogos: Friedman y Samuelson», en Juan Carlos García-Bermejo (ed.), Sobre la economía y sus métodos [Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, vol, 30], Madrid, Trotta-CSIC, 2009, pp. 21-34. 

(Co-ed.) Sección monográfica: “Filosofía Iberoamericana de la Economía”, Éndoxa: Series filosóficas nº 21, 2006, pp. 293-394 

«Henry Ludwell Moore y la introducción del positivismo estadístico en economía», en G. Marqués et al., eds., Objetividad, realismo y retórica. Nuevas perspectivas en metodología de la economía, Madrid: FCE, 2003, pp. 167-198. (Con A. Fernández)

  Azar, economía y política en Milton Friedman (Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, 2005)

  «¿Ética o economía? Philippe van Parijs y la renta básica», Isegoría 29 (2003), pp. 159-172.