Jesús Zamora Bonilla |Investigación | Research...
|
|
|
|
|
![Cuestión de protocolo (Filosofía - Filosofía Y Ensayo) de [Bonilla, Jesús Zamora]](https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51LMRlNNuNL.jpg)
![Ciencia pública-ciencia privada. Reflexiones sobre la producción del saber científico: 0 (Ciencia, Tecnologia, Sociedad) de [Bonilla, Jesús Zamora]](https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51KLGC4lhAL.jpg)
La nada nadea: invitación al nihilismo (Deusto, 2023).
Contra apocalípticos: ecologismo, animalismo, transhumanismo (Shackleton
Books, 2021).
Ver reseñas.
En busca del yo (Shackleton Books, 2022).
Sacando consecuencias: una filosofía para el siglo XXI, (Madrid,
Tecnos, 2017). (Ver
reseña en El Cultural, por Jacobo Muñoz).
The SAGE Handbook in the
Philosophy of Social Science, (editado con Ian Jarvie; Londres,
SAGE, 2011).
Cuestión
de protocolo. Ensayos de metodología de la ciencia (Madrid,
Tecnos, 2005; ver el
índice; nueva
edición 2013, disponible
también
en formato electrónico).
Ciencia
Pública-Ciencia Privada. Reflexiones sobre la producción
del saber científico (México, FCE, 2005, agotado
en papel).
La lonja del saber. Introducción a la economía del conocimiento
científico (Madrid, Servicio de publicaciones de
la UNED, 2003).
Mentiras a medias. Unas investigaciones sobre
el programa de la verosimilitud (Madrid, Servicio de publicaciones
de la U.A.M., 1996). (Escríbeme
si quieres un ejemplar en papel de este libro).
Truthlikeness, realism, and method (Collected papers, 1).
Economics of scientific knowledge (Collected papers, 2)
Economía del conocimiento científico/ Economics of Scientific Knowledge
The economics of scientific knowledge (a survey), in
The Elsevier Handbook in the Philosophy of Science, 2012
(Abstract).
The
Republic of Science and its Constitution, in
The Impact of Critical Rationalism, 2018.
The
market for scientific lemons, and the marketization of science,
Theoria, 2019.
The
nature of co-authorship. A note on recognition-sharing and scientific
argumentation, Synthèse, 2014 (Abstract).
Science: the rules of the game, The Logic Journal of ILPS,
2010. (Abstract).
To mine or not to mine? Using game theory to explain decision-making
process in asteroid mining investigations (with Simone Centuori),
Handbook of Research on Industrial Advancement in Scientific Knowledge, 2019.
What
games do scientists play? Rationality and objectivity in a game-theoretic
approach to the social construction of scientific knowledge, EPSA
Epistemology and Methodology of Science: Launch of the European
Philosophy of Science Association, 2009. (Abstract).
(Una versión en
español, publicada en la revista Artefactos)
The rationality of science and the rationality of scientists,
Studia Metodologizne, 2016. (Abstract).
Optimal
judgement aggregation, Philosophy of Science, 2007. (Abstract).
Rhetoric,
Induction and the Free Speech Dilemma, Philosophy
of Science, 2006. (Abstract).
Science
Studies and the Theory of Games, Perspectives
on Science, 2006. (Abstract).
Science
as a persuasion game, Episteme, 2006. (Abstract).
An economic model of scientific rules, (con José Luis Ferreira) Economics and Philosophy,
2006. (Abstract)
Scientific Inference and the Pursuit
of Fame: A Contractarian Approach, Philosophy of Science,2002.
(Abstract).
Economists: truth-seekers or rent-seekers? in U. Mäki (ed.), Fact
and Fiction, CUP, 2002. (Abstract)
The elementary economics of scientific consensus, Theoria,
1999. (Abstract)
On
the economic modelling of epistemic problems, (ppt) Helsinki University,
2006.
What game do scientists play?, (ppt) 1er
congreso EPSA, Madrid, 2007.
¿Es la ciencia un mercado
de ideas?, Artefactos,
2009.
Sociología de la
ciencia y economía de la ciencia: otra extraña pareja,
en Cuestión de protocolo. Ensayos de metodología de
la ciencia (Madrid, Tecnos, 2005), cap. 6.
United Kingdom,
four points; Royaume Uni, quatre points. La inferencia científica y el
festival de Eurovisión, en Ciencia pública-ciencia privada
(México, FCE, 2005), cap. 7.
Verosimilitud y aproximación a la verdad / Verisimilitude and truth approximation
Realism vs anti-realism: philosophical problem or scientific concern, Synthese, 2019. (Abstract).
See here de
video of a talk in Prague based on this paper.
Why are
good theories good? Reflections on epistemic values, confirmation and
formal epistemology, Synthese, 2013. (Abstract).
Truthlikeness
without truth: a methodological approch, Synthese, 1992. (Abstract).
Verisimilitude,
Structuralism, and Scientific Progress, Erkenntnis, 1996. (Abstract).
Verisimilitude
and the Dynamics of Scientific Research Programmes, Journal
for General Philosophy of Science 2002. (Abstract).
Truthlikeness, rationality, and scientific method, Synthese,
2000. (Abstract).
Verisimilitude and the scientific strategy of economic theory,
Journal of Economic Methodology, 1999. (Abstract).
Truthlikeness
with a Human Face. On Some Connections Between the Theory of Verisimilitude
and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge, In: R. Festa, A.
Aliseda and J. Peijnenburg (eds.), Confirmation, Empirical Progress,and
Truth Approximation (E Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences
and the Humanities,vol. 83), pp. 361-369. Amsterdam/New York, NY: Rodopi,
2005. (Abstract).
Inferencialismo y otros temas de filosofía de la ciencia / Inferentialism and other topics in philosophy of science
Rationality in
the social sciences: bridging the gap (epilogue of The SAGE Handbook
of Philosophy of the Social Sciences), SAGE, 2011.
The positive, the normative, and the ontology of social problems (in
The positive and the normative in economic thought, S. Badiei and
A. Grivaux, eds.), Routledge, 2022.
(Mis)understanding(,) idealization and truth. A critique of Angela
Potochnik's Idealization and the aims of science. Univ. Hradec
Kralove, oct 2018. Video.
Inferentialism,
rationality, and value-driven epistemology, Rationality and Decision
Making: From Normative Rules to Heuristics, Rodopi, 2018.
Collective actors without collective minds (con Javier González de
Prado), Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2015.
Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the
Face of Rational Disagreement (con Xavier de
Donato), Argumentation, 20014.
Credibility, idealisation, and model building (con Xavier de
Donato), Erkenntnis, 2009. (Abstract).
Science
Studies and the Theory of Games, Perspectives
on Science, 2006. (Abstract).
Science
as a persuasion game, Episteme, 2006. (Abstract).
Explanation
and modelization in a comprehensive inferentialist account, (con
Xavier de Donato) EPSA09 Philosophy of Science, Springer, 2011.
El debate del cambio climático interpretado como un juego de persuasión, (con
Leonardo Monzonís) Theoria, 2013.
Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist
Theory of Science, Erkenntnis 59: 47–76, 2003. (Abstract)
Why social
sciences are natural, and why they can't, Empiría, 2012. (Abstract).
Conversation, realism, and inference. Revisiting the realism vs.
rhetoric dispute, en Economics for Real, ed. A. Lehtinen;
Taylor & Francis, 2011.
Epistemic practices: an inferentalist-naturalist approach (ppt) TILPS,
Tilburg University, 2008.
Evolution,
empiricism, and purposeness (Evolutionism and
Religion, ed. E. Agazzi, 2011). (Abstract)
The
surprise exam paradox (con José Luis Ferreira), Journal of Economic
Methodology, 2009. (Abstract).
Unos dos mil tres indios. Reflexiones sobre la pragmática, el principio
de economía y la teoría de juegos, Daimon, 2010.
Como el ave que escapó de su
prisión (sobre libertad y determinismo, en Naturaleza animal y
humana, ed. Antonio Diéguez, Biblioteca Nueva), 2014.
La adaptación del darwinismo al medio hostil de la ficción audiovisual
(con Miguel Álvarez Peralta), Endoxa, 2011.
Por qué es casi seguro que tu mente no
está (ni estará nunca) en un ordenador. Revista Pasajes.